-
The Wargaming Commodity Course of Action Automated Analysis Method, March 2021
The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or
The primary difference is that this author primarily developed this system for US army decision making
SitaWare generates output graphs to visualize the COA analysis outcome, and the author claimed that the
AUTHOR(S) DeBerry, William T, Capt, USAF 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7.
2021
Conceptual Design and Development of Joint Service Wargame, 1982 June
AUTHOR(q) John A. MSdden, Lieutenant Colonel S. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER(&) John W.
APPLICATION P EXISTI= MR GNUNG NMRS AND SIWJLATIC" T O MET US*X AND AMC RE IWU N IS In this chapter the author
Interfacing MZ and T1X Alternative 3, interfacing MTM and TWX, is the alternative recom- mended by this author
1982
Operational Analysis: Divisional and Battlegroup Wargames, 1994
The difference in mean ranges between static and moving observers was not as great as the author would
(However, all this demonstrates is that BMP-3 is very effective as a light tank; the author has doubts
Address: Tel: Re\'iewed by: Title: Signature: Date: Authorized by: Title: Signature: Date: Principal author
1994