/Wargames_Exercises_Analysis.pdf: NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION (If applicable) Center for Naval Analyses CNA Office of the Chief of /Wargames_Exercises_Analysis.pdf: Alexandria, Virginia 22302-0268 . (703) 824-2000 18 February 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION LIST Subj: Center /Wargames_Exercises_Analysis.pdf: for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 86-20 Encl: (1) CNA Research Memorandum 86-20, *Wargames, Exercises /Wargames_Exercises_Analysis.pdf: SubJ: Center for Naval Analyses Research Memorandum 86-20 Distribution List SNDL OPNAV Al SECNAV OP-O0

/Integrating_Agile_Combat_Support.pdf: Center for Naval Analyses Naval Warfare Operations Division, 1985. Schalkoff, Robert J.

/Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_7th_Ed.pdf: Anti—Ship Missiles — Simulated Air—to—Air Battle PROPONENT: Chief of Naval Operations , OP—96 DEVELOPER: Center /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_7th_Ed.pdf: for Naval Analyses PURPOSE: CAM-SAA B is a computerized fleet air defense model designed to ascertain /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_7th_Ed.pdf: CPU time per model cycle SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: CONFIDENTIAL FREQUENCY OF USE: 100 per year USERS: Center /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_7th_Ed.pdf: for Naval Analyses POINT OF CONTACT: Center for Naval Analyses 1401 Wilson Boulevard Arling ton , Virginia /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_7th_Ed.pdf: Missiles — Surface—to—Air Missile Submodel PROPONENT: Chief of Naval Operations , OP—96 DEVELOPER: Center [...]

/Expanding_Simulations.pdf: Skinner, Professional Paper 463, Airland Battle Doctrine (Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses, /Expanding_Simulations.pdf: Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses, September 1988. U.S. Army.

/Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: Anti—Shi p Missiles — Simulated Air—to—Air PROPONENT: Chief of Na’-al Operations , OP— 96 DEVELOPER: Center /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: for Naval Analyses PURPOSE: CAN—SAAB is a computerized fleet air defense model designed 0 to ascertain /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: Y C L A S S I F I C A T I O N : CO N F I D E N T I A L FREQIJ’ENCY OF USE: 100 per year - 0 USERS: Center /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: for Naval Analyses POINT OF CONTACT: Cen ter for Nava l Analyses 1401 Wilson Boulevard Arlington , Virginia /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: Nuclear Warfare Simula tion • Chief of Naval Ope rations (oP—964) UNREP — Underway Rep lenishmen t Model Center [...]

/Better_Together.pdf: Andrew Ilachinski, “AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies” (Report for the Center /Better_Together.pdf: for Naval Analyses, Arlington, VA, January 2017), iii. /Better_Together.pdf: Report for the Center for Naval Analyses, Arlington, VA, January 2017.

/Globally_Integrated_Logistics_2017.pdf: PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Center for Naval Analyses 3003 Washington Blvd Arlington, VA 22201 /Globally_Integrated_Logistics_2017.pdf: To that end, the Joint Staff J-4 Directorate for Logistics designated the Center for Naval Analyses ( /Globally_Integrated_Logistics_2017.pdf: CLPSB Combatant Commander Logistics Procurement Support Board CMCoord Civil Military Coordination CNA Center /Globally_Integrated_Logistics_2017.pdf: for Naval Analyses COIN Counter-Insurgency CONUS Continental United States COP Common Operating Picture /Globally_Integrated_Logistics_2017.pdf: The JS J-4 Directorate for Logistics turned to the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) to develop the wargame [...]

/Smithson_2021.pdf: Alexandria, VA, USA: Center for Naval Analyses, 2006. [71] J. Appleget and R.

/US_ARL_2017.pdf: It is developed in conjunction with the Center for Naval Analyses, TRADOC G2, Naval Postgraduate School

/Political_Messaging_Strategic_Impact.pdf: French is an analyst and project director with the Strategic Initiatives Group at the Center for Naval /Political_Messaging_Strategic_Impact.pdf: Analyses, where his research focuses on seapower, strategic stability, deterrence, and escalation management /Political_Messaging_Strategic_Impact.pdf: A 1996 report by the Center for Naval Analyses observed that NATO participants ‘were unanimous in believing