/Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: Anti—Shi p Missiles — Simulated Air—to—Air PROPONENT: Chief of Na’-al Operations , OP— 96 DEVELOPER: Center /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: for Naval Analyses PURPOSE: CAN—SAAB is a computerized fleet air defense model designed 0 to ascertain /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: Y C L A S S I F I C A T I O N : CO N F I D E N T I A L FREQIJ’ENCY OF USE: 100 per year - 0 USERS: Center /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: for Naval Analyses POINT OF CONTACT: Cen ter for Nava l Analyses 1401 Wilson Boulevard Arlington , Virginia /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_8th_Ed.pdf: Nuclear Warfare Simula tion • Chief of Naval Ope rations (oP—964) UNREP — Underway Rep lenishmen t Model Center [...]

/Better_Together.pdf: Andrew Ilachinski, “AI, Robots, and Swarms Issues, Questions, and Recommended Studies” (Report for the Center /Better_Together.pdf: for Naval Analyses, Arlington, VA, January 2017), iii. /Better_Together.pdf: Report for the Center for Naval Analyses, Arlington, VA, January 2017.

/Smithson_2021.pdf: Alexandria, VA, USA: Center for Naval Analyses, 2006. [71] J. Appleget and R.

/Political_Messaging_Strategic_Impact.pdf: French is an analyst and project director with the Strategic Initiatives Group at the Center for Naval /Political_Messaging_Strategic_Impact.pdf: Analyses, where his research focuses on seapower, strategic stability, deterrence, and escalation management /Political_Messaging_Strategic_Impact.pdf: A 1996 report by the Center for Naval Analyses observed that NATO participants ‘were unanimous in believing

/Defense_Analysis_2023.pdf: used results from the first of the series, as well as two related logistics wargames conducted by the Center /Defense_Analysis_2023.pdf: for Naval Analyses, an FFRDC, to inform its design. /Defense_Analysis_2023.pdf: Agency • Missile Defense Agency • National Defense University • National Reconnaissance Office FFRDCs • Center /Defense_Analysis_2023.pdf: for Naval Analyses • Institute for Defense Analyses • MITRE Corporation • RAND Corporation Contractors

/US_ARL_2017.pdf: It is developed in conjunction with the Center for Naval Analyses, TRADOC G2, Naval Postgraduate School

/Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_12th_Ed.pdf: Documentation: (a) Center for Naval Analyses,, &Sea Battle Model (U)., CNR Research Contribution 373, /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_12th_Ed.pdf: Docý;mentation: Center for Naval Analyses, Antisubmarine C2ampain Model (Ub, CRM 86-125, May 1986, Swcret /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_12th_Ed.pdf: PROPONENT: Center for Naval Analyses, 4401 Ford Avenue, P.O. Sox 16268, Alexandria, VA 22302-0268. /Wargaming_and_Military_Simulation_Models_12th_Ed.pdf: Documentation: a) Center for Naval Analyses, ASea Battle Model (U), CNA Research Contribution 373, April

/Game_Report_Global08.pdf: representatives from Joint Forces Command (JFCOM), the Navy Warfare Development Command (NWDC), the Center /Game_Report_Global08.pdf: for Naval Analyses (CNA), and the Marine Corps Wargaming Department also contributed their expertise

/Epistemology_WarGaming_2006.pdf: .: Center for Naval Analyses, 2002).

/Business_Wargames_Military_2019.pdf: million over the five-year Future Years Defense Program spending plan� As a senior CNA (formerly the Center /Business_Wargames_Military_2019.pdf: for Naval Analyses) wargame expert stated, “Wargaming has gone through periods of popularity and disfavor